Visi raportai
wolfandsheeps_displayed pranešimai
#103875: "2-round game with switching sides?"
implemented: Šis pasiūlymas įgyvendintas
2
Apie ką šis pranešimas?
Kas nutiko? Pasirinkite iš žemiau esančio sąrašo
Siūlymas: manau, kad šis pakeitimas labai pagerintų žaidimą
Detalus apibūdinimas
• Prašome paaiškinti siūlomą pakeitimą tiksliai ir glaustai, kad būtų kuo lengviau suprasti, ką jūs siūlote.
Currently, most combinatorial games on BGA are either not strongly solved (e.g. Chess, Checkers, invented games, and etc.), solved but results in a draw with perfect play (e.g. Reversi, Nine Men's Morris, Quarto, etc.), or solved but negates the player position advantage by employing pie rule or its variant (e.g. Gomoku, Pente, etc.).
However, this game is an asymmetric combinatorial game and is described as a solved game (wolves win with perfect play).
Above a certain level of skills, a single round game is likely to depend on the player position.
So, implementing a 2-round mode where players play each side once might be a good idea.• Kokia tavo naršyklė?
Google Chrome v119
Raportų istorija
2023 lapkr. 13. 20:56 • ufm • Šio pasiūlymo kūrėjai dar neišanalizavo:
Some asymmetric games on BGA also have this option (e.g. Memoir '44, Jekyll vs. Hyde, etc.).
2023 lapkr. 13. 20:59 • ufm • Šio pasiūlymo kūrėjai dar neišanalizavo:
Also, the tiebreaker will be needed to prevent endless waves of 1:1 ties.
2023 lapkr. 14. 14:35 • Jonathan2004 • Kūrėjai norėtų daugiau informacijos apie šį pasiūlymą:
Thank you for your interest ;)
I think this is a good suggestion.
For now I think I only played 2 games with that kind of 2 round mode :
-Memoir'44 : the game rules state which players get a given number of points in each round, so we understand who is the winner
-Luck Numbers : (not the same kind of solvable game though) again the game rules state which player is the winner in 'tournament' mode
So we need to find a good way to find the winner in this game, do you think the lesser number of moves is enough ?
For example today I see those 2 tables with the same players :
- boardgamearena.com/table?table=439270363 megumaru wins in 17 moves
- boardgamearena.com/table?table=439275913 Askeladdd wins in 7 moves
=> Askeladdd should be declared winner of this 2 round game ?
I think this is a good suggestion.
For now I think I only played 2 games with that kind of 2 round mode :
-Memoir'44 : the game rules state which players get a given number of points in each round, so we understand who is the winner
-Luck Numbers : (not the same kind of solvable game though) again the game rules state which player is the winner in 'tournament' mode
So we need to find a good way to find the winner in this game, do you think the lesser number of moves is enough ?
For example today I see those 2 tables with the same players :
- boardgamearena.com/table?table=439270363 megumaru wins in 17 moves
- boardgamearena.com/table?table=439275913 Askeladdd wins in 7 moves
=> Askeladdd should be declared winner of this 2 round game ?
2023 lapkr. 14. 14:45 • ufm • Kūrėjai norėtų daugiau informacijos apie šį pasiūlymą:
Probably. Winning time as the tiebreaker makes sense.
2023 lapkr. 19. 11:05 • Jonathan2004 • Kūrėjai sutinka, kad tai gera idėja ir ketina prie jos dirbti:
I am working on it...
2023 lapkr. 19. 19:50 • Jonathan2004 • Šis pasiūlymas įgyvendintas:
Added in today's version 231119-1936.
Papildyti šį raportą
Pridėkite čia viską, kas atrodo svarbu, kad atkurti šią klaidą arba suprasti jūsų pasiūlymą:
- Kitas stalo ID / ėjimo ID
- Ar F5 išsprendė šią problemą?
- Ar problemos atsirado keletą kartų? Kiekvieną kartą? Atsitiktiniu metu?
- Jei turite klaidos nuotrauką (rekomenduojama padaryti), galite panaudoti Imgur.com bei nuotrauką įkelti bei čia įklijuoti nuorodą.
