• Jei ekrane matote kokį nors klaidos pranešimą, įklijuokite jį čia.

Chiefs in power get 2 consecutive turns only when in 1v1.
If the 2nd turn should be granted immediately, then it is inconsistent. Some games haven't given the 2nd consecutive move right after the Chief-in-power eliminated the 3rd Chief.

I do not remember the table number, but the difference was elimination by entrapment(this table) and elimination by a piece.

• Prašome paaiškinti, ką norėjote padaryti, ką padarėte ir kas atsitiko

Move 220 & Move 223

• Kokia tavo naršyklė?

• Prašome nukopijuoti / įklijuoti tekstą, rodomą anglų kalba, o ne savo kalba. Jei turite klaidos nuotrauką (rekomenduojama padaryti), galite panaudoti Imgur.com bei nuotrauką įkelti bei čia įklijuoti nuorodą.

Chiefs in power get 2 consecutive turns only when in 1v1.
If the 2nd turn should be granted immediately, then it is inconsistent. Some games haven't given the 2nd consecutive move right after the Chief-in-power eliminated the 3rd Chief.

I do not remember the table number, but the difference was elimination by entrapment(this table) and elimination by a piece.

• Ar šis tekstas yra translation system? Jei taip, ar jis buvo išverstas daugiau nei 24 valandas?

Move 220 & Move 223

• Kokia tavo naršyklė?

• Prašome paaiškinti siūlomą pakeitimą tiksliai ir glaustai, kad būtų kuo lengviau suprasti, ką jūs siūlote.

Chiefs in power get 2 consecutive turns only when in 1v1.
If the 2nd turn should be granted immediately, then it is inconsistent. Some games haven't given the 2nd consecutive move right after the Chief-in-power eliminated the 3rd Chief.

I do not remember the table number, but the difference was elimination by entrapment(this table) and elimination by a piece.

• Kokia tavo naršyklė?

• Kas buvo pavaizduota ekrane, tave užblokavus (juodas ekranas? Nepilna žaidimo sąsaja? Klaidos pranešimas?)

Chiefs in power get 2 consecutive turns only when in 1v1.
If the 2nd turn should be granted immediately, then it is inconsistent. Some games haven't given the 2nd consecutive move right after the Chief-in-power eliminated the 3rd Chief.

I do not remember the table number, but the difference was elimination by entrapment(this table) and elimination by a piece.

• Kokia tavo naršyklė?

• Į kurias taisykles neatsižvelgiama BGA žaidimo versijoje

Chiefs in power get 2 consecutive turns only when in 1v1.
If the 2nd turn should be granted immediately, then it is inconsistent. Some games haven't given the 2nd consecutive move right after the Chief-in-power eliminated the 3rd Chief.

I do not remember the table number, but the difference was elimination by entrapment(this table) and elimination by a piece.

• Ar taisyklių pažeidimas matomas žaidimo atkartojime? Jeigu taip, kuris veiksmo numeris?

Move 220 & Move 223

• Kokia tavo naršyklė?

• Kurį žaidimo veiksmą norėjai atlikti?

Chiefs in power get 2 consecutive turns only when in 1v1.
If the 2nd turn should be granted immediately, then it is inconsistent. Some games haven't given the 2nd consecutive move right after the Chief-in-power eliminated the 3rd Chief.

I do not remember the table number, but the difference was elimination by entrapment(this table) and elimination by a piece.

• Ką reikia padaryti, kad iššauktum šį žaidimo veiksmą?

Move 220 & Move 223

• Kas įvyko kai bandei tai padaryti (klaidos pranešimas, žaidimo būsenos pranešimas, ...)?

• Kokia tavo naršyklė?

• Kuriuo žaidimo metu problema atsirado (koks buvo tuometinis žaidimo nurodymas)?

Chiefs in power get 2 consecutive turns only when in 1v1.
If the 2nd turn should be granted immediately, then it is inconsistent. Some games haven't given the 2nd consecutive move right after the Chief-in-power eliminated the 3rd Chief.

I do not remember the table number, but the difference was elimination by entrapment(this table) and elimination by a piece.

• Kas įvyko kai bandei atlikti žaidimo veiksmą (klaidos pranešimas, žaidimo būsenos pranešimas, ...)?

Move 220 & Move 223

• Kokia tavo naršyklė?

• Aprašykite rodomą problemą. Jei turite klaidos nuotrauką (rekomenduojama padaryti), galite panaudoti Imgur.com bei nuotrauką įkelti bei čia įklijuoti nuorodą.

Chiefs in power get 2 consecutive turns only when in 1v1.
If the 2nd turn should be granted immediately, then it is inconsistent. Some games haven't given the 2nd consecutive move right after the Chief-in-power eliminated the 3rd Chief.

I do not remember the table number, but the difference was elimination by entrapment(this table) and elimination by a piece.

• Kokia tavo naršyklė?

• Prašome nukopijuoti / įklijuoti tekstą, rodomą anglų kalba, o ne savo kalba. Jei turite klaidos nuotrauką (rekomenduojama padaryti), galite panaudoti Imgur.com bei nuotrauką įkelti bei čia įklijuoti nuorodą.

Chiefs in power get 2 consecutive turns only when in 1v1.
If the 2nd turn should be granted immediately, then it is inconsistent. Some games haven't given the 2nd consecutive move right after the Chief-in-power eliminated the 3rd Chief.

I do not remember the table number, but the difference was elimination by entrapment(this table) and elimination by a piece.

• Ar šis tekstas yra translation system? Jei taip, ar jis buvo išverstas daugiau nei 24 valandas?

Move 220 & Move 223

• Kokia tavo naršyklė?

• Prašome paaiškinti siūlomą pakeitimą tiksliai ir glaustai, kad būtų kuo lengviau suprasti, ką jūs siūlote.

Chiefs in power get 2 consecutive turns only when in 1v1.
If the 2nd turn should be granted immediately, then it is inconsistent. Some games haven't given the 2nd consecutive move right after the Chief-in-power eliminated the 3rd Chief.

I do not remember the table number, but the difference was elimination by entrapment(this table) and elimination by a piece.

• Kokia tavo naršyklė?