Raportas • Board Game Arena

Visi raportai

Mapmaker: The Gerrymandering Game pranešimai

#29558: "The tie breaker calculated the wrong winner."

notabug: Tai ne klaida

Apie ką šis pranešimas?

Mapmaker: The Gerrymandering Game #129404798

Kas nutiko? Pasirinkite iš žemiau esančio sąrašo

Taisyklės: Nebuvo laikytasi žaidimo taisyklių

Kas nutiko? Pasirinkite iš žemiau esančio sąrašo

Taisyklės: Nebuvo laikytasi žaidimo taisyklių

Patikrinkite, ar jau yra pranešimas apie tą patį dalyką

Jei taip, balsuokite už šią ataskaitą. Ataskaitos su dauguma balsų pateikiamos PRIORITETU!

#	Status	Votes	Game	Type	Title	Last update

Detalus apibūdinimas

Raportų istorija

2020 Dec 7. 04:01 • TheRandy • Klaida dar neištirta programuotojų:

The tie breaker calculated the wrong winner.
We both had 4 districts.
We both controlled 1 swing county.
The game assigned the victory to the other payer:
(blue) Forevergm 4 (2)
(red) TheRandy 4 (1)

The output message was: "Number of swing counties won"-
there are only 2 swing counties in the game.

Looking at the rules: "On the rare occasion that there’s still a tie, go to the Supreme Court. Whichever tied player has the fewest total votes for their own party within their own districts wins." My count was: (it might be off a point of 2): 78 blue - 63 red.

2020 Dec 7. 04:21 • gkz • Tai ne klaida:

In an `n` player game, there should be `n + 1` swing counties: the `n` 1 tokens for each color and the neutral 0 token.

In this particular game, the blue player won the red 1 and the blue 1 (looks like the red 1 was underneath a meeple). The red player won the neutral 0. Thus the game counted the swing counties correctly.

---

Note that with 2 players, it should be impossible to go to the Supreme Court (since the tie break is majority of the 3 swing counties). With more players, it's possible to have a tie in swing counties. However, in such a case, the game won't actually fall back to this Supreme Court rule, since that was never implemented :). It'll just say that both players ended up winning. I'm also not sure if BGA's framework will allow for multiple tiebreak conditions (just based on the structure of the config), but I could look into it if it becomes a problem.

2020 Dec 23. 18:46 • Scott_wmu • Tai ne klaida:

Per the notes above, it looked like the second tiebreaker was never coded (“Supreme Court”). We played a 4 player where is showed a shared victory even though Yellow was the victor per the rules (57 < 65 votes for own in own districts).

boardgamearena.com/table?table=132155273

Just pointing out an occurrence - not sure how often it happens.

2020 Dec 23. 19:35 • gkz • Tai ne klaida:

Thanks for the note! Could you actually open a suggestion bug about implementing supreme court? I don't think it'll happen that often, but would be better to track separately from this.

Papildyti šį raportą

Pridėkite čia viską, kas atrodo svarbu, kad atkurti šią klaidą arba suprasti jūsų pasiūlymą:

Kitas stalo ID / ėjimo ID
Ar F5 išsprendė šią problemą?
Ar problemos atsirado keletą kartų? Kiekvieną kartą? Atsitiktiniu metu?
Jei turite klaidos nuotrauką (rekomenduojama padaryti), galite panaudoti Imgur.com bei nuotrauką įkelti bei čia įklijuoti nuorodą.

Atšaukti Atnaujinti raportą

#29558: "The tie breaker calculated the wrong winner."

Apie ką šis pranešimas?

Kas nutiko? Pasirinkite iš žemiau esančio sąrašo

Kas nutiko? Pasirinkite iš žemiau esančio sąrašo

Patikrinkite, ar jau yra pranešimas apie tą patį dalyką

Detalus apibūdinimas

Raportų istorija

Papildyti šį raportą

Pakeisti raporto būseną į:

Pagalba

Prisidėti

Naviguoti

Sekite mus