• Jei ekrane matote kokį nors klaidos pranešimą, įklijuokite jį čia.

I propose that the score as evaluated at endgame should be separated from the money totals when one player ends the game.

The game can end very suddenly, and it seems not uncommon that a player could be set to win on the next turn, but have less current money (because it's tied up in goods) than a player who is 5 turns from winning but just sold a bunch of goods, so has more liquid assets.

The simplest solution would seem to be to dissociate the current money from the score, display the money rather than the official endgame score in the sidebar, and just give all non-winners joint 2nd.

• Prašome paaiškinti, ką norėjote padaryti, ką padarėte ir kas atsitiko

• Kokia tavo naršyklė?

• Prašome nukopijuoti / įklijuoti tekstą, rodomą anglų kalba, o ne savo kalba. Jei turite klaidos nuotrauką (rekomenduojama padaryti), galite panaudoti Imgur.com bei nuotrauką įkelti bei čia įklijuoti nuorodą.

I propose that the score as evaluated at endgame should be separated from the money totals when one player ends the game.

The game can end very suddenly, and it seems not uncommon that a player could be set to win on the next turn, but have less current money (because it's tied up in goods) than a player who is 5 turns from winning but just sold a bunch of goods, so has more liquid assets.

The simplest solution would seem to be to dissociate the current money from the score, display the money rather than the official endgame score in the sidebar, and just give all non-winners joint 2nd.

• Ar šis tekstas yra translation system? Jei taip, ar jis buvo išverstas daugiau nei 24 valandas?

• Kokia tavo naršyklė?

• Prašome paaiškinti siūlomą pakeitimą tiksliai ir glaustai, kad būtų kuo lengviau suprasti, ką jūs siūlote.

I propose that the score as evaluated at endgame should be separated from the money totals when one player ends the game.

The game can end very suddenly, and it seems not uncommon that a player could be set to win on the next turn, but have less current money (because it's tied up in goods) than a player who is 5 turns from winning but just sold a bunch of goods, so has more liquid assets.

The simplest solution would seem to be to dissociate the current money from the score, display the money rather than the official endgame score in the sidebar, and just give all non-winners joint 2nd.

• Kokia tavo naršyklė?

• Kas buvo pavaizduota ekrane, tave užblokavus (juodas ekranas? Nepilna žaidimo sąsaja? Klaidos pranešimas?)

I propose that the score as evaluated at endgame should be separated from the money totals when one player ends the game.

The game can end very suddenly, and it seems not uncommon that a player could be set to win on the next turn, but have less current money (because it's tied up in goods) than a player who is 5 turns from winning but just sold a bunch of goods, so has more liquid assets.

The simplest solution would seem to be to dissociate the current money from the score, display the money rather than the official endgame score in the sidebar, and just give all non-winners joint 2nd.

• Kokia tavo naršyklė?

• Į kurias taisykles neatsižvelgiama BGA žaidimo versijoje

I propose that the score as evaluated at endgame should be separated from the money totals when one player ends the game.

The game can end very suddenly, and it seems not uncommon that a player could be set to win on the next turn, but have less current money (because it's tied up in goods) than a player who is 5 turns from winning but just sold a bunch of goods, so has more liquid assets.

The simplest solution would seem to be to dissociate the current money from the score, display the money rather than the official endgame score in the sidebar, and just give all non-winners joint 2nd.

• Ar taisyklių pažeidimas matomas žaidimo atkartojime? Jeigu taip, kuris veiksmo numeris?

• Kokia tavo naršyklė?

• Kurį žaidimo veiksmą norėjai atlikti?

I propose that the score as evaluated at endgame should be separated from the money totals when one player ends the game.

The game can end very suddenly, and it seems not uncommon that a player could be set to win on the next turn, but have less current money (because it's tied up in goods) than a player who is 5 turns from winning but just sold a bunch of goods, so has more liquid assets.

The simplest solution would seem to be to dissociate the current money from the score, display the money rather than the official endgame score in the sidebar, and just give all non-winners joint 2nd.

• Ką reikia padaryti, kad iššauktum šį žaidimo veiksmą?

• Kas įvyko kai bandei tai padaryti (klaidos pranešimas, žaidimo būsenos pranešimas, ...)?

• Kokia tavo naršyklė?

• Kuriuo žaidimo metu problema atsirado (koks buvo tuometinis žaidimo nurodymas)?

I propose that the score as evaluated at endgame should be separated from the money totals when one player ends the game.

The game can end very suddenly, and it seems not uncommon that a player could be set to win on the next turn, but have less current money (because it's tied up in goods) than a player who is 5 turns from winning but just sold a bunch of goods, so has more liquid assets.

The simplest solution would seem to be to dissociate the current money from the score, display the money rather than the official endgame score in the sidebar, and just give all non-winners joint 2nd.

• Kas įvyko kai bandei atlikti žaidimo veiksmą (klaidos pranešimas, žaidimo būsenos pranešimas, ...)?

• Kokia tavo naršyklė?

• Aprašykite rodomą problemą. Jei turite klaidos nuotrauką (rekomenduojama padaryti), galite panaudoti Imgur.com bei nuotrauką įkelti bei čia įklijuoti nuorodą.

I propose that the score as evaluated at endgame should be separated from the money totals when one player ends the game.

The game can end very suddenly, and it seems not uncommon that a player could be set to win on the next turn, but have less current money (because it's tied up in goods) than a player who is 5 turns from winning but just sold a bunch of goods, so has more liquid assets.

The simplest solution would seem to be to dissociate the current money from the score, display the money rather than the official endgame score in the sidebar, and just give all non-winners joint 2nd.

• Kokia tavo naršyklė?

• Prašome nukopijuoti / įklijuoti tekstą, rodomą anglų kalba, o ne savo kalba. Jei turite klaidos nuotrauką (rekomenduojama padaryti), galite panaudoti Imgur.com bei nuotrauką įkelti bei čia įklijuoti nuorodą.

I propose that the score as evaluated at endgame should be separated from the money totals when one player ends the game.

The game can end very suddenly, and it seems not uncommon that a player could be set to win on the next turn, but have less current money (because it's tied up in goods) than a player who is 5 turns from winning but just sold a bunch of goods, so has more liquid assets.

The simplest solution would seem to be to dissociate the current money from the score, display the money rather than the official endgame score in the sidebar, and just give all non-winners joint 2nd.

• Ar šis tekstas yra translation system? Jei taip, ar jis buvo išverstas daugiau nei 24 valandas?

• Kokia tavo naršyklė?

• Prašome paaiškinti siūlomą pakeitimą tiksliai ir glaustai, kad būtų kuo lengviau suprasti, ką jūs siūlote.

I propose that the score as evaluated at endgame should be separated from the money totals when one player ends the game.

The game can end very suddenly, and it seems not uncommon that a player could be set to win on the next turn, but have less current money (because it's tied up in goods) than a player who is 5 turns from winning but just sold a bunch of goods, so has more liquid assets.

The simplest solution would seem to be to dissociate the current money from the score, display the money rather than the official endgame score in the sidebar, and just give all non-winners joint 2nd.

• Kokia tavo naršyklė?