#133510: "The opponent intentionally did not counted a dead stone in a game where defeat was confirmed."
Apie ką šis pranešimas?
Kas nutiko? Pasirinkite iš žemiau esančio sąrašo
Kas nutiko? Pasirinkite iš žemiau esančio sąrašo
Patikrinkite, ar jau yra pranešimas apie tą patį dalyką
Jei taip, balsuokite už šią ataskaitą. Ataskaitos su dauguma balsų pateikiamos PRIORITETU!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detalus apibūdinimas
-
• Jei ekrane matote kokį nors klaidos pranešimą, įklijuokite jį čia.
Literally, The opponent intentionally did not designate a dead stone in a game where defeat was confirmed, which unfairly changed the outcome of the game.
-
• Prašome paaiškinti, ką norėjote padaryti, ką padarėte ir kas atsitiko
When the game is over and the opponent counts a dead stone, you can see that the opponent didn't choose his dead stone at all and pressed the finish of selection button. This is a clear cheating attempt to unfairly change the outcome in a game where defeat has been decided. Please check it and take proper action on this.
• Kokia tavo naršyklė?
Google Chrome v127
-
• Prašome nukopijuoti / įklijuoti tekstą, rodomą anglų kalba, o ne savo kalba. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Ar šis tekstas yra translation system? Jei taip, ar jis buvo išverstas daugiau nei 24 valandas?
Literally, The opponent intentionally did not designate a dead stone in a game where defeat was confirmed, which unfairly changed the outcome of the game.
• Kokia tavo naršyklė?
Google Chrome v127
-
• Prašome paaiškinti siūlomą pakeitimą tiksliai ir glaustai, kad būtų kuo lengviau suprasti, ką jūs siūlote.
Literally, The opponent intentionally did not designate a dead stone in a game where defeat was confirmed, which unfairly changed the outcome of the game.
• Kokia tavo naršyklė?
Google Chrome v127
-
• Kas buvo pavaizduota ekrane, tave užblokavus (juodas ekranas? Nepilna žaidimo sąsaja? Klaidos pranešimas?)
Literally, The opponent intentionally did not designate a dead stone in a game where defeat was confirmed, which unfairly changed the outcome of the game.
• Kokia tavo naršyklė?
Google Chrome v127
-
• Į kurias taisykles neatsižvelgiama BGA žaidimo versijoje
Literally, The opponent intentionally did not designate a dead stone in a game where defeat was confirmed, which unfairly changed the outcome of the game.
-
• Ar taisyklių pažeidimas matomas žaidimo atkartojime? Jeigu taip, kuris veiksmo numeris?
When the game is over and the opponent counts a dead stone, you can see that the opponent didn't choose his dead stone at all and pressed the finish of selection button. This is a clear cheating attempt to unfairly change the outcome in a game where defeat has been decided. Please check it and take proper action on this.
• Kokia tavo naršyklė?
Google Chrome v127
-
• Kurį žaidimo veiksmą norėjai atlikti?
Literally, The opponent intentionally did not designate a dead stone in a game where defeat was confirmed, which unfairly changed the outcome of the game.
-
• Ką reikia padaryti, kad iššauktum šį žaidimo veiksmą?
When the game is over and the opponent counts a dead stone, you can see that the opponent didn't choose his dead stone at all and pressed the finish of selection button. This is a clear cheating attempt to unfairly change the outcome in a game where defeat has been decided. Please check it and take proper action on this.
-
• Kas įvyko kai bandei tai padaryti (klaidos pranešimas, žaidimo būsenos pranešimas, ...)?
• Kokia tavo naršyklė?
Google Chrome v127
-
• Kuriuo žaidimo metu problema atsirado (koks buvo tuometinis žaidimo nurodymas)?
Literally, The opponent intentionally did not designate a dead stone in a game where defeat was confirmed, which unfairly changed the outcome of the game.
-
• Kas įvyko kai bandei atlikti žaidimo veiksmą (klaidos pranešimas, žaidimo būsenos pranešimas, ...)?
When the game is over and the opponent counts a dead stone, you can see that the opponent didn't choose his dead stone at all and pressed the finish of selection button. This is a clear cheating attempt to unfairly change the outcome in a game where defeat has been decided. Please check it and take proper action on this.
• Kokia tavo naršyklė?
Google Chrome v127
-
• Aprašykite rodomą problemą. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
Literally, The opponent intentionally did not designate a dead stone in a game where defeat was confirmed, which unfairly changed the outcome of the game.
• Kokia tavo naršyklė?
Google Chrome v127
-
• Prašome nukopijuoti / įklijuoti tekstą, rodomą anglų kalba, o ne savo kalba. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Ar šis tekstas yra translation system? Jei taip, ar jis buvo išverstas daugiau nei 24 valandas?
Literally, The opponent intentionally did not designate a dead stone in a game where defeat was confirmed, which unfairly changed the outcome of the game.
• Kokia tavo naršyklė?
Google Chrome v127
-
• Prašome paaiškinti siūlomą pakeitimą tiksliai ir glaustai, kad būtų kuo lengviau suprasti, ką jūs siūlote.
Literally, The opponent intentionally did not designate a dead stone in a game where defeat was confirmed, which unfairly changed the outcome of the game.
• Kokia tavo naršyklė?
Google Chrome v127
Raportų istorija
Because of my first experience with this, I managed to save my game in this way:
My opponent & I passed. My opponent refused to mark the dead stones. When the question came, "Do you want to have a stage of designate dead stones after next series of passes?", I naturally answered, "yes". I kept playing and killed enough groups to make the game clearly won, and when we both passed, there was no re-counting of dead stones.
Sure enough, my opponent had selected "no", as I suspected he would.
This clearly promotes cheating. The proposed solutions are as follows, going from best to worst:
1) An algorithm that automatically designates dead stones.
2) NO QUESTION about having another stage for designating stones. Since there was already one stage, but the players COULDN'T AGREE, that means that there AUTOMATICALLY needs to be another round of dead stone designation. This should just happen every time.
3) If the question remains like it does now, it should be that if EITHER or BOTH of the players answers "yes", then there should be a stone counting stage.
Papildyti šį raportą
- Kitas stalo ID / ėjimo ID
- Ar F5 išsprendė šią problemą?
- Ar problemos atsirado keletą kartų? Kiekvieną kartą? Atsitiktiniu metu?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
