• Jei ekrane matote kokį nors klaidos pranešimą, įklijuokite jį čia.

I would like to see the ability for a player to concede a game be removed. I believe all games should be played to their natural conclusion, regardless of outcome. Some players are using the ability to concede in order to "game" the ELO points system. Also, I find it frustrating, and I think childish. An alternative to eliminating concessions altogether may be to penalise it strongly - whomever concedes loses 50 ELO points, the other player gains 50 points, over and above the value of the game itself. And of course, a detriment to the reputation standing of the conceding player, as well.

• Prašome paaiškinti, ką norėjote padaryti, ką padarėte ir kas atsitiko

• Kokia tavo naršyklė?

• Prašome nukopijuoti / įklijuoti tekstą, rodomą anglų kalba, o ne savo kalba. Jei turite klaidos nuotrauką (rekomenduojama padaryti), galite panaudoti Imgur.com bei nuotrauką įkelti bei čia įklijuoti nuorodą.

I would like to see the ability for a player to concede a game be removed. I believe all games should be played to their natural conclusion, regardless of outcome. Some players are using the ability to concede in order to "game" the ELO points system. Also, I find it frustrating, and I think childish. An alternative to eliminating concessions altogether may be to penalise it strongly - whomever concedes loses 50 ELO points, the other player gains 50 points, over and above the value of the game itself. And of course, a detriment to the reputation standing of the conceding player, as well.

• Ar šis tekstas yra translation system? Jei taip, ar jis buvo išverstas daugiau nei 24 valandas?

• Kokia tavo naršyklė?

• Prašome paaiškinti siūlomą pakeitimą tiksliai ir glaustai, kad būtų kuo lengviau suprasti, ką jūs siūlote.

I would like to see the ability for a player to concede a game be removed. I believe all games should be played to their natural conclusion, regardless of outcome. Some players are using the ability to concede in order to "game" the ELO points system. Also, I find it frustrating, and I think childish. An alternative to eliminating concessions altogether may be to penalise it strongly - whomever concedes loses 50 ELO points, the other player gains 50 points, over and above the value of the game itself. And of course, a detriment to the reputation standing of the conceding player, as well.

• Kokia tavo naršyklė?

• Kas buvo pavaizduota ekrane, tave užblokavus (juodas ekranas? Nepilna žaidimo sąsaja? Klaidos pranešimas?)

I would like to see the ability for a player to concede a game be removed. I believe all games should be played to their natural conclusion, regardless of outcome. Some players are using the ability to concede in order to "game" the ELO points system. Also, I find it frustrating, and I think childish. An alternative to eliminating concessions altogether may be to penalise it strongly - whomever concedes loses 50 ELO points, the other player gains 50 points, over and above the value of the game itself. And of course, a detriment to the reputation standing of the conceding player, as well.

• Kokia tavo naršyklė?

• Į kurias taisykles neatsižvelgiama BGA žaidimo versijoje

I would like to see the ability for a player to concede a game be removed. I believe all games should be played to their natural conclusion, regardless of outcome. Some players are using the ability to concede in order to "game" the ELO points system. Also, I find it frustrating, and I think childish. An alternative to eliminating concessions altogether may be to penalise it strongly - whomever concedes loses 50 ELO points, the other player gains 50 points, over and above the value of the game itself. And of course, a detriment to the reputation standing of the conceding player, as well.

• Ar taisyklių pažeidimas matomas žaidimo atkartojime? Jeigu taip, kuris veiksmo numeris?

• Kokia tavo naršyklė?

• Kurį žaidimo veiksmą norėjai atlikti?

I would like to see the ability for a player to concede a game be removed. I believe all games should be played to their natural conclusion, regardless of outcome. Some players are using the ability to concede in order to "game" the ELO points system. Also, I find it frustrating, and I think childish. An alternative to eliminating concessions altogether may be to penalise it strongly - whomever concedes loses 50 ELO points, the other player gains 50 points, over and above the value of the game itself. And of course, a detriment to the reputation standing of the conceding player, as well.

• Ką reikia padaryti, kad iššauktum šį žaidimo veiksmą?

• Kas įvyko kai bandei tai padaryti (klaidos pranešimas, žaidimo būsenos pranešimas, ...)?

• Kokia tavo naršyklė?

• Kuriuo žaidimo metu problema atsirado (koks buvo tuometinis žaidimo nurodymas)?

I would like to see the ability for a player to concede a game be removed. I believe all games should be played to their natural conclusion, regardless of outcome. Some players are using the ability to concede in order to "game" the ELO points system. Also, I find it frustrating, and I think childish. An alternative to eliminating concessions altogether may be to penalise it strongly - whomever concedes loses 50 ELO points, the other player gains 50 points, over and above the value of the game itself. And of course, a detriment to the reputation standing of the conceding player, as well.

• Kas įvyko kai bandei atlikti žaidimo veiksmą (klaidos pranešimas, žaidimo būsenos pranešimas, ...)?

• Kokia tavo naršyklė?

• Aprašykite rodomą problemą. Jei turite klaidos nuotrauką (rekomenduojama padaryti), galite panaudoti Imgur.com bei nuotrauką įkelti bei čia įklijuoti nuorodą.

I would like to see the ability for a player to concede a game be removed. I believe all games should be played to their natural conclusion, regardless of outcome. Some players are using the ability to concede in order to "game" the ELO points system. Also, I find it frustrating, and I think childish. An alternative to eliminating concessions altogether may be to penalise it strongly - whomever concedes loses 50 ELO points, the other player gains 50 points, over and above the value of the game itself. And of course, a detriment to the reputation standing of the conceding player, as well.

• Kokia tavo naršyklė?

• Prašome nukopijuoti / įklijuoti tekstą, rodomą anglų kalba, o ne savo kalba. Jei turite klaidos nuotrauką (rekomenduojama padaryti), galite panaudoti Imgur.com bei nuotrauką įkelti bei čia įklijuoti nuorodą.

I would like to see the ability for a player to concede a game be removed. I believe all games should be played to their natural conclusion, regardless of outcome. Some players are using the ability to concede in order to "game" the ELO points system. Also, I find it frustrating, and I think childish. An alternative to eliminating concessions altogether may be to penalise it strongly - whomever concedes loses 50 ELO points, the other player gains 50 points, over and above the value of the game itself. And of course, a detriment to the reputation standing of the conceding player, as well.

• Ar šis tekstas yra translation system? Jei taip, ar jis buvo išverstas daugiau nei 24 valandas?

• Kokia tavo naršyklė?

• Prašome paaiškinti siūlomą pakeitimą tiksliai ir glaustai, kad būtų kuo lengviau suprasti, ką jūs siūlote.

I would like to see the ability for a player to concede a game be removed. I believe all games should be played to their natural conclusion, regardless of outcome. Some players are using the ability to concede in order to "game" the ELO points system. Also, I find it frustrating, and I think childish. An alternative to eliminating concessions altogether may be to penalise it strongly - whomever concedes loses 50 ELO points, the other player gains 50 points, over and above the value of the game itself. And of course, a detriment to the reputation standing of the conceding player, as well.

• Kokia tavo naršyklė?