• Jei ekrane matote kokį nors klaidos pranešimą, įklijuokite jį čia.

Move 114 (and almost every other skirmish before that) was 4 to 3, but the game stated there was "no clear winner" and shuffled the contested resource into the junkyard. Other skirmishes also were called "no clear winner" even though the number of people involved weren't the same.

The ONLY skirmishes where the game didn't call it a tie were ones where one player had a strength of 0.

This contradicts page 8 of the rules "Then the total remaining fight values are summed and the player with the highest fight value wins...In the event of a tie, each player sums the number of people involved in the skirmish"

• Prašome paaiškinti, ką norėjote padaryti, ką padarėte ir kas atsitiko

114

• Kokia tavo naršyklė?

• Prašome nukopijuoti / įklijuoti tekstą, rodomą anglų kalba, o ne savo kalba. Jei turite klaidos nuotrauką (rekomenduojama padaryti), galite panaudoti Imgur.com bei nuotrauką įkelti bei čia įklijuoti nuorodą.

Move 114 (and almost every other skirmish before that) was 4 to 3, but the game stated there was "no clear winner" and shuffled the contested resource into the junkyard. Other skirmishes also were called "no clear winner" even though the number of people involved weren't the same.

The ONLY skirmishes where the game didn't call it a tie were ones where one player had a strength of 0.

This contradicts page 8 of the rules "Then the total remaining fight values are summed and the player with the highest fight value wins...In the event of a tie, each player sums the number of people involved in the skirmish"

• Ar šis tekstas yra translation system? Jei taip, ar jis buvo išverstas daugiau nei 24 valandas?

114

• Kokia tavo naršyklė?

• Prašome paaiškinti siūlomą pakeitimą tiksliai ir glaustai, kad būtų kuo lengviau suprasti, ką jūs siūlote.

Move 114 (and almost every other skirmish before that) was 4 to 3, but the game stated there was "no clear winner" and shuffled the contested resource into the junkyard. Other skirmishes also were called "no clear winner" even though the number of people involved weren't the same.

The ONLY skirmishes where the game didn't call it a tie were ones where one player had a strength of 0.

This contradicts page 8 of the rules "Then the total remaining fight values are summed and the player with the highest fight value wins...In the event of a tie, each player sums the number of people involved in the skirmish"

• Kokia tavo naršyklė?

• Kas buvo pavaizduota ekrane, tave užblokavus (juodas ekranas? Nepilna žaidimo sąsaja? Klaidos pranešimas?)

Move 114 (and almost every other skirmish before that) was 4 to 3, but the game stated there was "no clear winner" and shuffled the contested resource into the junkyard. Other skirmishes also were called "no clear winner" even though the number of people involved weren't the same.

The ONLY skirmishes where the game didn't call it a tie were ones where one player had a strength of 0.

This contradicts page 8 of the rules "Then the total remaining fight values are summed and the player with the highest fight value wins...In the event of a tie, each player sums the number of people involved in the skirmish"

• Kokia tavo naršyklė?

• Į kurias taisykles neatsižvelgiama BGA žaidimo versijoje

Move 114 (and almost every other skirmish before that) was 4 to 3, but the game stated there was "no clear winner" and shuffled the contested resource into the junkyard. Other skirmishes also were called "no clear winner" even though the number of people involved weren't the same.

The ONLY skirmishes where the game didn't call it a tie were ones where one player had a strength of 0.

This contradicts page 8 of the rules "Then the total remaining fight values are summed and the player with the highest fight value wins...In the event of a tie, each player sums the number of people involved in the skirmish"

• Ar taisyklių pažeidimas matomas žaidimo atkartojime? Jeigu taip, kuris veiksmo numeris?

114

• Kokia tavo naršyklė?

• Kurį žaidimo veiksmą norėjai atlikti?

Move 114 (and almost every other skirmish before that) was 4 to 3, but the game stated there was "no clear winner" and shuffled the contested resource into the junkyard. Other skirmishes also were called "no clear winner" even though the number of people involved weren't the same.

The ONLY skirmishes where the game didn't call it a tie were ones where one player had a strength of 0.

This contradicts page 8 of the rules "Then the total remaining fight values are summed and the player with the highest fight value wins...In the event of a tie, each player sums the number of people involved in the skirmish"

• Ką reikia padaryti, kad iššauktum šį žaidimo veiksmą?

114

• Kas įvyko kai bandei tai padaryti (klaidos pranešimas, žaidimo būsenos pranešimas, ...)?

• Kokia tavo naršyklė?

• Kuriuo žaidimo metu problema atsirado (koks buvo tuometinis žaidimo nurodymas)?

Move 114 (and almost every other skirmish before that) was 4 to 3, but the game stated there was "no clear winner" and shuffled the contested resource into the junkyard. Other skirmishes also were called "no clear winner" even though the number of people involved weren't the same.

The ONLY skirmishes where the game didn't call it a tie were ones where one player had a strength of 0.

This contradicts page 8 of the rules "Then the total remaining fight values are summed and the player with the highest fight value wins...In the event of a tie, each player sums the number of people involved in the skirmish"

• Kas įvyko kai bandei atlikti žaidimo veiksmą (klaidos pranešimas, žaidimo būsenos pranešimas, ...)?

114

• Kokia tavo naršyklė?

• Aprašykite rodomą problemą. Jei turite klaidos nuotrauką (rekomenduojama padaryti), galite panaudoti Imgur.com bei nuotrauką įkelti bei čia įklijuoti nuorodą.

Move 114 (and almost every other skirmish before that) was 4 to 3, but the game stated there was "no clear winner" and shuffled the contested resource into the junkyard. Other skirmishes also were called "no clear winner" even though the number of people involved weren't the same.

The ONLY skirmishes where the game didn't call it a tie were ones where one player had a strength of 0.

This contradicts page 8 of the rules "Then the total remaining fight values are summed and the player with the highest fight value wins...In the event of a tie, each player sums the number of people involved in the skirmish"

• Kokia tavo naršyklė?

• Prašome nukopijuoti / įklijuoti tekstą, rodomą anglų kalba, o ne savo kalba. Jei turite klaidos nuotrauką (rekomenduojama padaryti), galite panaudoti Imgur.com bei nuotrauką įkelti bei čia įklijuoti nuorodą.

Move 114 (and almost every other skirmish before that) was 4 to 3, but the game stated there was "no clear winner" and shuffled the contested resource into the junkyard. Other skirmishes also were called "no clear winner" even though the number of people involved weren't the same.

The ONLY skirmishes where the game didn't call it a tie were ones where one player had a strength of 0.

This contradicts page 8 of the rules "Then the total remaining fight values are summed and the player with the highest fight value wins...In the event of a tie, each player sums the number of people involved in the skirmish"

• Ar šis tekstas yra translation system? Jei taip, ar jis buvo išverstas daugiau nei 24 valandas?

114

• Kokia tavo naršyklė?

• Prašome paaiškinti siūlomą pakeitimą tiksliai ir glaustai, kad būtų kuo lengviau suprasti, ką jūs siūlote.

Move 114 (and almost every other skirmish before that) was 4 to 3, but the game stated there was "no clear winner" and shuffled the contested resource into the junkyard. Other skirmishes also were called "no clear winner" even though the number of people involved weren't the same.

The ONLY skirmishes where the game didn't call it a tie were ones where one player had a strength of 0.

This contradicts page 8 of the rules "Then the total remaining fight values are summed and the player with the highest fight value wins...In the event of a tie, each player sums the number of people involved in the skirmish"

• Kokia tavo naršyklė?